SARPROZ ©

you have to update your codes
also, if you report errors, include logs and lasterrors
please read carefully here: https://sarproz.com/manual/Sarproz_errors_management.html

Hello,
I got ‘Unrecognized field name “processed_range_bandwidth”.’ in the pcodes version when clicking on ‘Get Contents’.
(And I got ‘Reference to non-existent field ‘processed_range_bandwidth.” in compiled version.)
Thanks.

Dear all,
1. Sarproz ingests Capella SLC data in the tif/json format. Files should be named starting with the string “CAPELLA_”. The rest of the general rules for importing SLC data apply (check the manual). Generally, you should never rename files.
2. Capella SLC tif files might be compressed. in such case, you need to use the Sarproz pcodes…[Read more]

Hello,

I have a set of Capella SLC data. (The attached image is the list of data I got.)
But I face some problems when reading them with SARPROZ.
Does that mean I need another file? Or what can I do to use them?

SLC Should work well

Dear Friend, I have the same problem did you get your ansewr?

Dear friends,
I have a question, if i change version of my MATLAB, can i still work with SARPROZ? or i should give a new license?

Please read carefully the document below before taking any actions:
https://sarproz.com/manual/Sarproz_errors_management.html

Hello,

You were right, there was a bit difference in the name of the file from the automatic one, that I don’t know how!, but yes the name was the issue!

Thank you for your helpful hints.

Best regards,
Mahtab

Hello again,

Yes, I know it is not an issue with the software. I thought maybe I am exporting wrongly.
Thank you for the hints, all answers are yes, same things, but the problem is still there. I need to investigate what is going on afterwards as you mentioned.

Thank you 🙂

Best regards,
Mahtab

Hi Mahtab,
unfortunately, as you can understand, this problem does not apply to Sarproz. Instead, it is related to something else, happening afterward. So, hereafter some hints, hope it helps, but then you find the problem yourself.
are you re-opening the exact same KMZ (not kml!) file? search for that, check location, size and date. Are you…[Read more]

Thank you again for your comments.

Hi,
to interpret the coherence value, one should give many more details: what model you are using, what parameters are estimated, what options you applied, which images graph, whether weights are used, whether the atmosphere is corrected or not, and so on and so fort, the list could be long. Without having those details, you cannot interpret well…[Read more]

Hi,
I am using windows. I’ve scanned through the files and haven’t noticed any obvious difference between the >1GB and <1GB.
I agree that is good to know if this is confirmed by others and hopefully there will be ways to go around it. Maybe a functionality from the Time Series Module to split the area in tiles (separate archives, maybe with a…[Read more]