SARPROZ ©

On the contrary, I believe the net disk is the major problem.
Can you check the network usage?
Or can you simply try to copy the dataset locally? Note that you do not need the SLC folder. So, I believe the rest of the folders should be quite small.

On the contrary, I believe the net disk is the major problem.
Can you check the network usage?
Or can you simply try to copy the dataset locally? Note that you do not need the SLC folder. So, I believe the rest of the folders should be quite small.

there is no evident reason for your problem
the file is 2.2MB, less than 1.5e6 points
loading the file in matlab takes a few seconds
I am wondering whether you could have problems affecting matlab and/or windows installation.
or maybe some problems in reading/writing operations: is the file on a local or external disk?
which kind of disk are you…[Read more]

the mask file is independent from the number of images
it would be nice to know how big is maschera.mat, and which is the size of your dataset (samples and lines).
by the way, which option did you use for mask generation?
are you working with windows? what’s the size of the RAM?

given the infos you posted,
I expect the geocoding through external DEM to work well

download manually the following file and place it into the same folder of main.exe
http://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/latest/x86/psftp.exe

download manually the following file and place it into the same folder of main.exe
http://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/latest/x86/psftp.exe

Thanks,
this was a bug (in the compiled version) and it has just been fixed. At this moment you can download the windows compiled version (using the manage version module).
Are you using windows or linux?

Thanks,
this was a bug (in the compiled version) and it has just been fixed. At this moment you can download the windows compiled version (using the manage version module).
Are you using windows or linux?

Hi Santiago,

did you read this? http://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/data-import-update-with-external-data/

did you download the last version, produced after that discussion? let me know if it solves your issue.

As explained many times to you in person,
in this forum, in the manual, tutorials and so on,
the best way to geocode a dataset is precisely manually. In fact, it takes very little to geocode a dataset manually in Sarproz.
You can check it in the many examples in the tutorials.
Why?
1. because there are many sensors for which the orbital…[Read more]

1) why do you use DS=10 and DL=10?
Leave DL=0.
2) how big is the area, did you check the initial selection of points in the refl map/amp stab map?
18 images is enough for a PS-like analysis, but you have to be very careful because all statistical indexes are affected by the low number of images.
3) why didn’t you keep the Non-Linear weights…[Read more]

the log file is very explicit
u should carefully read the messages from the sw

after the
WARNING!!!!! The cube of loaded data contains 26 images, while the current dataset has 31 data
You can load the data again through “Select Area”
which it seems you read,

then the sw says:
reading phase-flat coefficients
leggi_flat: at least one…[Read more]

this result looks much more reasonable.
however, I’d suggest you to use the I.R. APS. read old posts on this topic.

I do not understand your question about the amplitude time series.
Your example looks ok and it shows that no evident pattern is visible.
For other cases, please read some papers about temporary PSs (or check the ampl time series…[Read more]

probably you used wrong weights.
which APS options are you using?
Can you grab the APS module screen and show them to us?
Also, how many images are you processing, from which sensor, which images graph?

hi Ivana,

thanks for your message, indeed, I found a bug, introduced by an update, in a non-tested configuration.
I am going to upload soon the bug fix.
The error occurred while managing the index of images to add.
You noticed that in your case the sw processed again all images (which should not happen).
As a consequence, all images were added…[Read more]

Hi Ana.
the selection of points looks not good. so, the graph has few good connections and the result is quite bad.
if you are analyzing a 3×3 sqkm area and you have a GPS station at 8km distance you cannot do much.
dp

Hi Ana.
the selection of points looks not good. so, the graph has few good connections and the result is quite bad.
if you are analyzing a 3×3 sqkm area and you have a GPS station at 8km distance you cannot do much.
dp

Sarproz has many ways to export results.
The two most common ones can be found in the “results exporting” frame in site processing: “extended geocoding” and “sparse geocoding”.
In the first case, you can choose between kml and geotiff formats. In the second case, the options are: csv and kml.
If you want to export sparse results (as those…[Read more]

1 and 3. When you work with Persistent Scatterers (without using weights, that is, without filtering) Sarproz does not need to generate and write interferograms. Interferograms may be processed if you want to see them or if you want to use filtered phase. If you choose to process your data with a QPS-like approach (that is, using the coherence as…[Read more]